Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Robocopy Config file?

If you run Robocopy with an RCJ file (Robocopy Job) just once, then the file is just that: a job file. However, if you plan to use the same settings over and over again, then consider this a configuration file that is easily modifiable and copyable to reuse on other directories.

I personally have a directory structure set up like:

  |        |--*.RCJ files
  |        |--*.lob files
  |--*.bat files (for single jobs)
  |--RunAllBUs.bat (to execute all jobs)

The log files should be self-explanatory. Here I just want to run through the bat and RCJ files.

For my individual bat files, I will use something like this for all single jobs:

@echo off

cd c:\users\myusername\desktop\BackUp
robocopy /JOB:BackUpJobs\[WhatItIs]BUJOB.RCJ 

Where [WhatItIs] is something indicating what directory I am backing up. For example, if I was backing up the CIS577 directory, the path would be: BackUpJobs\CIS577BUJOB.RCJ
As with any bat script, the path is relative to where the script is executing from.

Now for the fun part, the rcj "config" files. These files, if you know the syntax for robocopy, can be modified in short time to create a full backup system with a variety of operations. For instance, one job can do a /MOV, which will delete everything from the source after it's copied to the destination while another job just makes a copy of the directory and all subs(/E), copying new(er) files to the destination.


:: Robocopy Job
:: Created by myusername on Sun Apr 10 2011 at 20:46:13
:: Modified by hand. 15 May at 1210 am.

:: Source Directory :

/SD:C:\Users\myusername\Desktop\CIS577\ :: Source Directory.

:: Destination Directory :
/DD:\\werdenshare\GoFlex Home Personal\DaveSchoolMain\UofM_Dearborn\CIS577\
:: Destination Directory.

:: Include These Files :
/IF :: Include Files matching these names
:: *.* :: Include all names (currently - Command Line may override)
:: Exclude These Directories :
/XD :: eXclude Directories matching these names
:: :: eXclude no names (currently - Command Line may override)
:: Exclude These Files :
/XF :: eXclude Files matching these names
:: :: eXclude no names (currently - Command Line may override)

:: Copy options :
/S ::Copy Subdirs but not empty ones
/E ::Copy Subdirs including empty ones
/COPY:DAT :: what to COPY (default is /COPY:DAT).

:: Retry Options :
:: number of Retries on failed copies: default 1 million.
:: Wait time between retries: default is 30 seconds.

:: Logging Options :
:: output status to LOG file (overwrite existing log).

The RCJ file does nothing more than pass the parameters on the command line that you would be using if you didn't use the job file. So without this file, your robocopy job using the above would be:
$>robocopy C:\Users\myusername\Desktop\CIS577\ "\\werdenshare\GoFlex Home Personal\DaveSchoolMain\UofM_Dearborn\CIS577\" 
/S /E /LOG+:C:\Users\myusername\Desktop\BackUp\BackUpLogs\CIS577BULog.log
A couple things to notice: the source and destination directories ONLY need to be wrapped in quotation marks IF either one has spaces AND is passed on the command line. In the RCJ file, no quotation marks needed. Also, if you notice the command line example parameters, you will see [source] [destination] /S /E /LOG+. and not the other options such as /XD from the file. This is becuase when a job you created is saved to an RCJ file, all defaults are written to the file unless you have passed a paremeter to overwrite their usage completely.
The really easy part that I like is that I can copy this file out, adjust the source and destination, at a minimum, and then save the file as another robocopy job file. The extra bit of ease here, if you know where the options go, is that you can easily add any option changes to the files as you create them or modify your needs. For example, in the Copy options section, I can add /MOV to the list of uncommented parameters and this will do what you'd expect as I mentioned before (although the folder/subfolder structure will remain intact.)
This is probably enough from me on Robocopy this year. :-)   Now I am working on a perl script to take an exported list of IE and FireFox bookmarks and to create an XML file for these. Other than the easy answer of just wanting a quicker way to access good used references, the format I am going with (as created by my buddy James) will allow me to add usernames, masked passwords (if I am feeling crazy), and/or password hints. Additionally, I am going to take it a step farther for another display field for things such as Frequent Flyer program numer and POC info. Really this is an academic exercise to create something I want...I get a little tired of scrolling through a TON of bookmarks on a LOT of different computers. By doing this, I can keep it updated and portable....basically a poor-man's way to sync some favorites between computers.

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Checking in...and ISSA Meeting awesomeness!

So I didn't get the time I thought I would to do one "oneliner each day" for July. Been really busy with work trips, finishing up a grueling semester with the world's worst professor, and just trying to take a breather for a day or two. That said, I really don't have any freetime right now with the kids and the wife starting school. However, I did make time to go the Quarterly Greater Augusta ISSA meeting. That was a GREAT decision.

Not only was it great to see friends and catch-up a was really awesome to listen to John Strand (of fame and and Matt Jonkman (Emerging Threats, Suricata). Anyone who was aware of this meeting and just arbitrarily chose to not go...shame on you becuase it was VERY good!

Strand's presentation was really kick-butt. He talked more about a change in culture, what's effective (and not effective) and things he thought were appropriate for moving forward. The real examples he laid out, especially regarding SSL issues, were pretty awesome! The dude was really rocking his presentation and I think we all learned something while having some really good laughs!

Jonkman focused primarily on Suricata. It started out more like a sales pitch and, in fairness, it probably primarily was just that. However, the information he passed ended up being pretty interesting to me, especially about some of the upcoming releases for Suricata. I have had some exchanges with Jonkman in the past and he's always struck me as pretty smart, which he again appeared to be so tonight.